use v6;
use Test;
plan 20;
# TODO: *really* need a better smartlink
# L<S02/Literals/"If the unrecognized subroutine name">
# Since these are all parsing tests, they should use eval to ensure all tests
# can run even if something is broken. (Unless things are VERY broken.)
#?pugs emit if $?PUGS_BACKEND ne "BACKEND_PUGS" {
#?pugs emit skip_rest "PIL2JS and PIL-Run do not support eval() yet.";
#?pugs emit exit;
#?pugs emit }
# These tests are for parse-fails:
# (They check that the parser doesn't abort, but they might still parse
# incorrectly.)
{
sub foo(*@args, *%named) { 1 } #OK not used
ok eval(q/foo; /), 'call with no args, no parens';
ok eval(q/foo(); /), 'call with no args, has parens';
ok eval(q/&foo.(); /), 'call with no args, has dot and parens';
ok eval(q/&foo\ .(); /), 'call with no args, has long dot and parens';
ok eval(q/foo 1; /), 'call with one arg, no parens';
ok eval(q/foo(1); /), 'call with one arg, has parens';
ok eval(q/&foo.(1); /), 'call with one arg, has dot and parens';
ok eval(q/&foo\ .(1);/), 'call with one arg, has long dot and parens';
#?pugs todo 'unspecced'
nok eval(q/foo'bar'; /), 'call with one arg, has no space and no parens';
ok eval(q/foo 1, 2; /), 'call with two args, no parens';
ok eval(q/foo(1, 2);/), 'call with two args, has parens';
#?rakudo todo 'should parse as a routine foo:bar'
ok eval(q/foo:bar; /), 'call with adverb after no space';
ok eval(q/foo :bar; /), 'call with adverb after space';
ok eval(q/foo(:bar); /), 'call with adverb in parens';
ok eval(q/&foo.(:bar); /), 'call with adverb in dotted-parens';
ok eval(q/&foo\.(:bar);/), 'call with adverb in long-dotted parens';
}
# These tests are for mis-parses:
{
sub succ($x) { $x + 1 }
is(eval(q/succ (1+2) * 30;/), 91, "parens after space aren't call-parens");
ok(!eval(q/succ .(1+2) * 30;/), 'parsed as method call on $_');
}
{
sub first() { "first" }
is(eval(q/first.uc/), 'FIRST', '`first.second` means `(first()).second()`');
}
{
is(eval(q/"hello".substr: 1, 2/), "el", "listop method");
# foo $bar.baz: quux
# should be (and is currently) interpreted as:
# foo($bar.baz(quux))
# where the alternate interpretation can be achieved by:
# foo ($bar.baz): quux
# which is interpreted as
# $bar.baz.foo(quux)
# but we need tests, tests, tests! XXX
}
# vim: ft=perl6